ends in tears
Jun 24th, 2010 by lesley
“Political careers end in tears.” So says political editor Laurie Oakes. Went to bed having watched the fighting speech from Kevin Rudd. Woke up to watch the media pack at Parliament House, waiting for the Reporting Officer to bring the result. Half-an-hour later we have our first female PM. Such an historical moment doesn’t have the celebratory feel that I had hoped for and expected. Amid my sadness that Rudd’s primeministership has ended in this way, my disappointment about the seeming limited shelf-life of ‘loyalty’, my frustration over the power and influence of the factions, I have to say that I am looking forward to the entertainment value of Gillard and Abbott locking horns. Politics is a game for mugs and thugs. Where o’ where is the intelligent, compassionate, inspirational leader? Perhaps it’s just not possible in the present flawed political system. Good luck Gillard. You’re going to need it. I didn’t vote for Rudd; I voted for Labor. However, a lot of people would say they voted for Rudd and may be angry about what has happened this morning.
12.12pm - Rudd has made his last public speech as PM. Emotional, teary, and heartbreaking. Ironically, he spoke like the kind of leader I want for our country. Why didn’t he speak more in this way, with such warmth and compassion, during his time in office? Gillard has also spoken with “great humility” and conviction, and made her position very clear. Most interestingly, Rudd has said he will stay on to contest his seat in the next election, and to work within in the government. Will he end up with a portfolio? Gillard would be wise to give him one that matches his personal values and convictions, and let him speak frankly about the issues he feels most passionate - homelessness, asylum seekers, health, poverty, indigenous issues, etc. He has managed to connect more closely with the public, and even the press(!), in the last hour than he was able to in recent months. He was the Kevin Rudd we wanted to see more of, more often.
I agree. I think there was a lesson there for me as well. I get so scared of putting a foot wrong for criticism in a public (much less so tho I must say) job that it is easier sometimes to “keep the factions happy”. The irony of rudds speech was, as you say, we like the guy who is more than a walking self protection mechanism. As I tweeted before:Lesson for ministers from krudd’s speech: dont wait till you leave to show people in church the “real you”. Its nice to see the real rudd.
This is my take home from the speeches. I wholeheartedly agree with the statements you’ve made Lesley
I don’t think she will give him a portfolio, I aslo think he will change his mind in re contesting his seat. I think staying on at the moment is just to not show disunity in the party so they don’t lose even more in the polls.
I reckon he will end up as a OS diplomat in the UN or similar.
You could be right. I guess was hoping for a more idealistic, romanticised outcome. I still think Rudd would make an excellent ‘ambassador’ for Labor on local issues, if only to counter Barnaby Joyce’s airtime. Giving him a portfolio would require a cabinet reshuffle, unless he takes Finance, left vacant now that Tanner is leaving, but I can’t see that happening.
I don’t think gillard would overthrow him then give him a portfolio,
The current speculation is that Rudd may get Foreign Affairs. The whole spectacle is quite fascinating in a car-crash kind of way.
foreign affairs would be his forte, but I still don’t think he will get it.
I don’t think he should re contest at the election.